The political crises and upheavals of our age often originate from the periphery rather than the center of power. Figures like Edward Snowden, Julian Assange, and Chelsea Manning acted in ways that disrupted power, revealing truths that those in power wanted to keep hidden. They are thorns in the side of power, troublemakers in the eyes of the powerful, though their actions may be valuable and lead to positive changes.

In this important new book, Dieter Thomä examines the crucial but often overlooked function of these figures on the margins of society, developing a philosophy of troublemakers from the seventeenth century to the present day. Thomä takes as his starting point Hobbess idea of thepuer robustus (literally stout boy), meaning a figure who rebels against order and authority. While Hobbes saw thepuer robustus as a threat, he also recognized the potential, in the right conditions, for figures to rise up and become agents of positive change. Building on this notion, Thomä provides a rich survey of intellectuals who have been inspired by this idea over the past 300 years, from Rousseau, Diderot, Schiller, Victor Hugo, Marx, and Freud to Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, and Horkheimer, right up to the recent work of Badiou and Agamben. In doing so, he develops a typology of thepuer robustus and a means by which we can evaluate and assess the troublemakers of our own times.

Thomä shows that troublemakers are an inescapable part of modernity, for as soon as social and political boundaries are defined, there will always be figures challenging them from the margins. This book will be of great interest not only to students and scholars in the humanities and social sciences but to anyone seeking to understand the crucial impact of these liminal figures on our world today.

Dieter Thomä is Professor of Philosophy at the University of St. Gallen

AcknowledgementsIntroductionI. The puer robustus as an evil man: Thomas Hobbes1. The threshold creature caught between power, morality and history 2. Self-interest and reason 3. Hobbess egocentric troublemakers: Fools, epileptics, madmen, the poor and the rich 4. Author-actor-audience theory: The eccentric troublemaker in the belly of the Leviathan 5. The puer robustus of Horace  a model for Hobbes?II. The puer robustus as a good man: Jean-Jacques Rousseau1. The power and morality of the savage 2. The transformation of the puer robustus into a citizen 3. What does Rousseaus puer robustus do after his victory? Democracy and disturbance of the peaceIII. Rameaus nephew as a puer robustus: Denis Diderot1. Hobbess sublime definition 2. The puer robustus as a social problem or ambivalent character: Diderot beyond Helvétius, Hobbes and Rousseau 3. Life on the threshold: Rameaus Nephew 4. Hegels and Foucaults nephewIV. Unloving child, wicked son, strong savior: Friedrich Schiller1. The puer robustus as a freedman of creation 2. Franz and Karl Moor: All power for me  or a different power for all? 3. Wilhelm Tells journey from loner to league founderV. The puer robustus as victim and hero: Victor Hugo1. Quasimodo as a monkey gone wrong 2. The birth of wickedness from humiliation 3. Moral emancipation 4. The street urchin as a puer robustus 5. The relatives of the street urchin: Balzacs real man and Baudelaires little savageVI. Siegfried, foolish boy: Richard Wagner1. The contract as a crime against nature 2. External salvation 3. The hero as child and dullard: Siegfrieds recipe for successVII. The puer robustus between Europe and America: Alexis de Tocqueville1. The birth of the puer robustus under the yoke of despotism: Tocquevilles first insight  2. Praise for America and a warning against the Wild West 3. The birth of the puer robustus from the spirit of capitalism: Tocquevilles second insight 4. Life as a revolution and experiment: Tocqueville, Mill, NietzscheVIII. The puer robustus as a revolutionary: Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels1. The people is by far the most dangerous 2. The fight against dependence and separation 3. The lumpenproletariat as the spoilsport of the revolution 4. The revolutionary subject as a species-being or community-beingIX. The puer robustus as Oedipus: Sigmund Freud1. The little savage 2. Democracy and dictatorship 3. Politics after Freud: A debate between Walter Lippmann, Paul Federn, Hans Blüher, Thomas Mann and Hans KelsenX. Anarchists, adventurers, young rowdies and little savages:Carl Schmitt, Leo Strauss, Helmut Schelsky and Max Horkheimer1. Blossoming in dark times: Hobbes da capo 2. Carl Schmitt on the total state and its enemies 3. Leo Strauss on the closed society and adventurers 4. Helmut Schelsky on power and young rowdies 5. Max Horkheimer on the authoritarian state and little savagesXI. Good spirits and poisonous weeds: The puer robustus in Italy in 1949 and China in 19571. Togliattis New Years message to his comrades 2. Mao Zedong and Tan Tianrong on fragrant flowers and poisonous weeds 3. From China back to Europe: We can forget Alain BadiouXII. The puer robustus today1. No end to history 2. The egocentric troublemaker and the financial crisis 3. The eccentric and nomocentric troublemaker  and the democratic paradox 4. The massive troublemaker and fundamentalism 5. The little savage and the populism of Donald Trump 6. On the thresholdNotesList of abbreviationsLiteratureIndex